Skip to main content

Identifying problems vs. providing solutions

One of the things that concerns me about the direction of Information Security as a discipline is the focus on what I call "gee whiz security". This is the flashy, trendy stuff like new attacks and the marketing terms of the moment (that often are actually meaningful terms that marketing people misuse or misappropriate). It is good to stay on top of new developments, new attack vectors, new defense ideas, etc. but (for most of us that are employed by a company) our job is to provide solutions to solve these issues or provide suggestions on how to mitigate the risks associated with these threats.

If all you provide is a constant stream of risks and concerns without any meaningful solutions or ideas on how to manage a problem, your employer is likely going to have to look elsewhere. This is why when folks ask me about penetration testing as a career choice I advise them to consider a more balanced approach. You can find any number of people or companies that will tell you how bad things are, but what most enterprises want is someone that can find the problems and propose a solution or a plan to address it.

Some advice:

1) When proposing a penetration test - determine what your goal is. Maybe you are better off working with the internal audit or risk management team to understand the known issues and test to see if they have been resolved first.

2) Use a standard methodology when doing any assessments. This should be adjusted to match the policies and standards of the site you are assessing.

3) Every problem or risk you identify should have a solution that matches the companies policies or standards
It's always better to look at assessments as an opportunity to provide ideas and solutions vs. showing someone how broken things may be.

->Pierre

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Requirements for Information Security

If you want to get into Information Security you HAVE to be a/have this skill... Why this is total BS. Almost daily I see someone posting on twitter, trying to be helpful to folks who are looking to get into InfoSec. Often I see "If you want to be in Information Security (Cyber Security) then you HAVE to be a programmer" or "If you want to be successful you have to be a hacker/have a criminal record/have abused systems without permission" etc. While having technical capabilities (such as programming) and having the ability to compromise a system shows a specific skillset neither are required. When talking to people who are interested in Information Security I often refer to it as a cake, there are tons of slices, many flavors, many pieces and parts you can sample, choose to focus on, will be expected to know something about, etc. Incident Response and Forensics (my current focus) is not the only part of Information Security, and certainly not the only part tha
Post a Comment
Read more

Busting the myth of the malicious insider

The Myth of the Insider Threat Too often after the announcement of a new breach, the first reaction from the victim company and the media is "another malicious insider attack".  Case in point, I was catching up on news from various sources and came across the following: http://www.idgconnect.com/abstract/19647/lessons-sage-leak " “We believe there has been some unauthorised access using an internal login to the data of a small number of our UK customers so we are working closely with the authorities to investigate the situation,” the Newcastle, England-headquartered firm said in a statement." Of course an internal login was used to access the data, as part of the attack lifecycle, during your reconnaissance phase you identify accounts to target for possible compromise, based on the access/role of the individual.   Phishing attacks or other simply attacks are often successful in gathering login credentials for individual users, which can then of
Post a Comment
Read more
Weekly recap and why you should be concerned about "attackers" even if you have "nothing to hide" Why you should be aware of, defend against, and prevent attackers... even at home: I often hear from future victims "well I don't have anything to hide/anything of value/why would they target me!?" It's really not about you, usually the attackers aren't looking for your data (if they get it, or have easy access to it, they may try to profit from it, but the people doing the compromising aren't usually the same folks that monetize). What the attackers want are compromised systems they can use to do what they want at scale. So if they can compromise 50 systems, they can send 50X the amount of SPAM... 100 systems, 100X, etc. Some operations get paid based on the number of emails they can send per day. Of course the email will likely not just be SPAM, but may also be malicious (ransomware, etc.). http://thehackernews.com/2017/09/linux-ma
Post a Comment
Read more